Check off list for final projects
- Does your project/program work?
Majid: The program does work with no more errors anymore. (once had errors from certain computers)
Itai: The program does work.
- Does the project pseudocode provide you with enough information to understand what the program is going to do? If not what suggestions do you have?
Majid: Yes, the project’s pseudocode provides enough information to help me understand the program.
Itai: Yes, the pseudocode is very straightforward and clear.
- Have you provided an overview of what your project/program will do. This needs to be a “Read me” file. The “Read Me” file document needs to be in your folder on the Z drive(labstudents) as well as posted on your blog.
Majid: Yes, explains to me step-by-step on how to play the final version of the game.
Itai: Yes, very clear on taking me through on the program.
- Does the project/program meet all of the requirements? If not what is missing?
Majid: No, missing while statements, boolean objects, arrays, etc.
Itai: Yes.
- Is a peer able to run your project without your help? If there are many questions asked by your peer evaluator, double check to write out these instructions as part of the read me file or redo your program so that it eliminates the questions.
Majid: Yes
Itai: Yes
- Are there errors in logic; spelling; in documentation or programming logic-is there an easier way to do this program?
(project creators: Allow enough time to correct them!)
Majid: There are errors with the timer going off but Majid’s computer did not have that error.
Itai: No errors I found.
- Final suggestions to improve the project or program?
Majid: Change the timer code since it heavily affects the code if the variables are off.
Itai: Make the coding look a bit neater and the program is very good! :)
No comments:
Post a Comment